The need to “map” – as with tests whit swabs –
seems to be necessary
just because the fake data released by the institutions
mistakenly made you think
that the spread of this influence
is a danger to society.
But it has actually been proven that
– the spread of the virus is not a problem (where the most vulnerable individuals are protected), but it is indeed the way to ensure that the flu epidemic is extinguished.
– the virus spreads with such rapidity that it is not possible to trace its diffusion (in reality it has emerged that when Institutions intervenes to “fight the virus” a large part of the population was already infected, although never showing symptoms)
– who is “positive” on the test represents only a danger for the most vulnerable individuals (who are 1% of the population, and are easily identifiable). While it does not represent any danger for the Society in general (vulnerable individuals can be protected with non-catastrophic measures such as those related to lockdown).
One thing that is not taken into account is that a vulnerable individual – in a real Democracy – must be able to decide to take a risk for his own health: that is, he must be able to decide whether to choose a condition of hyper-protection or a condition that allows him to enjoy the last years of one’s life, for example, freely seeing grandchildren (remember that if older people have the right tools at home, they don’t risk so much) [see interview with the vice governor of Texas]