There are two justifications (which we see to be unfounded in an analysis of the facts) for the emergency measures against Covid-19:
● the danger of a second wave: a totally risky hypothesis.
● the need for a vaccine in order to return to the complete reopening of the Society: Scientists and experience on previous attempts tell us that it is very unlikely that a vaccine will be found.
■ the second wave
The idea that
there may be a “second wave” of Covid-19
capable of producing
the same damage as the first wave
is totally devoid of scientific data support:
● to date no one is able to predict that there may be a second wave of this Virus: the prediction of a second wave is therefore a total gamble, which is based on an unscientific approach to reality in which it is thought that predict the worst (even if there are no scientific forecasts of this worst scenario). <<a class=”modal-link” href=”http://www.lucabottazzi.com/2/holistica/?popup=sources-the-danger-of-the-second-wave-of-covid-19-and-the-arrival-of-a-vaccine-have-no-scientific-basis”> see sources </a>>
Paradoxically, this approach lays the foundations for a catastrophe in the Heathcare Systems, since – as prof. Bassetti (director of the Infectious Diseases Clinic of the San Martino hospital in Genoa) says – in this way in the first cold weather, with the seasonal spread of the flu, people will clog the hospitals paralyzing them even more than for Covid-19.
● even if there were to have a second wave of Covid-19, the experience of the first phase would allow us to face the event with a certain safety, allowing for example to treat people at home (this if the condition of panic widespread now in the Society).
.
To understand how the second wave cannot be really scary, it is necessary to consider that most of the deaths in the Covid-19 “pandemic” reported in the statistics were caused by serious errors such as:
– the decision to sacrifice the elderly (who accounted for most of the dead).
– the deaths in the early stages are largely due to treatment errors: an incorrect approach has led to a reduction in autopsies, and therefore to not understanding the nature of the disease. Believing it to be pneumonia, they gave the patients oxygen under pressure, but as the problem was a weakness of the blood vessels, these therapies literally killed the patients. <<a class=”modal-link” href=”http://www.lucabottazzi.com/2/holistica/?popup=sources-incorrect-treatment-killed-patients“> see sources </a>>
– a large part of the deaths attributed to Covid-19 are actually due to other primary factors. <read more>
■ the problems related to the vaccine for Covid-19
Experience tells us that a vaccine has not been found for this type of virus (SARS) after seventeen years of research.
And that therefore, from a scientific point of view, the vaccine for Covid-19 appears to be unachievable.
<<a class=”modal-link” href=”http://www.lucabottazzi.com/2/holistica/?popup=the-problems-related-to-the-vaccine-for-covid-19″> see sources </a>>
Has the anti-influenza vaccine worsened the consequences of the Covid-19 flu?
To evaluate the advisability of waiting for a vaccine to return to a normal life, we must also remember that scientific observations indicate how
the areas in which the most severe forms of Covid-19
have developed correspond to those
where intense anti-influenza (anti-Coronavirus) vaccination policies have been applied.
The considerations can be many, but the data are the following, and they cannot be ignored in the conclusions. Investigating Bergamo and Whuan it emerges that:
1) Bergamo and Whuan were among the two cities with the highest number of deaths.
2) Whuan is the first city in the world to have adopted the G5 extensively, as well as mandatory influenza vaccination. Bergamo had applied a mass vaccination for the first year.
It is therefore difficult to argue that the vaccine was not a facilitator for the most serious, deadly form of the Coronavirus.
The improbability, from a scientific point of view, of being able to obtain a vaccine for Covid-19
Vaccines for the flu virus are almost impossible to create (vaccines are highly specific, if the virus changes, the vaccine is inneffective):
● this virus changes continuously and therefore – since it takes months of work since a virus is discovered – when the vaccine is ready the virus has already changed (and the vaccine is ineffective)
● the virus is “intelligent” and over the years it has become increasingly capable of resisting vaccines (it is a bit of a problem with antibiotics, the use of which creates increasingly resistant bacteria).
