IN SUPPORT OF THE THESIS
OF THE DANGER OF COVID-19
(and therefore of the emergency measures)
(1) NO DATA EXIST (VERIFIED BY SCIENTIFIC PROCEDURES).
(2) ALL DATA PRODUCED BY THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY SHOWS COVID-19 IS A NORMAL INFLUENCE
This is easily verified by doing any Google search:
1) information on the danger of the Coronavirus of 2020: no information that speaks of the danger of the Coronavirus of the 2020 is supported by scientific data (there is a “communication” based solely on suppositions of possible dangers not indicated by any scientific research, by any data).
2) information on Coronavirus 2020 as ordinary influence: information relating to the nature of the virus – documented according to scientific criteria – show that the one of 2020 (COVID-19) is the usual annual flu Coronavirus.
The first institutional information comes from the governments of South Korea and Taiwan, which were the first to solve the problem of the epidemic – successfully. <► see Forbes “South Korea Sees Coronavirus Slowdown—Without A Lockdown”> <► see “South Korea’s coronavirus response is the opposite of China and Italy – and it’s working”>
This was followed by the research of the most important global scientific Institutions, such as, among others, Stanford University, Johns Hopkins University, the most important Italian swab analysis laboratory, the German Official Ministry of Interior, Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center. <►see “Coronavirus death rate may be lower than previously thought”> <► see “New German Study Finds Coronavirus Mortality Rate at 0.37% — Ten Times Less Than Flawed WHO Numbers that Sent Global Community into a Panic”>
.
Lung complications from ordinary seasonal influences have always caused the many deaths published in the statistics of Covid-19, but no one has ever thought of making a drama of it (indeed, this year in the USA there have been fewer deaths than in 2019). The only difference is this year it was decided to publish terrifying projections on the possible number of deaths (which later turned out to be grossly false).
.
.
In summary, as regards the number of deaths related to the Covid-19 epidemic:
■ Covid-19 caused the same number of deaths as the Coronaviruses of previous years: (0.1% of the population).
Today it is understood how the people in whose death the virus played a decisive role were already very weakened by other determining factors (old age, serious pathologies).
● BBC News – «nine in 10 [deaths] did have pre-existing illnesses, such as heart disease and respiratory problems that put them at heightened risk of death anyway.» <see Article>
In other words, as happens every year, in 2020 the flu of Coronavirus caused the death of people “at risk” (a very low percentage of the population that, in any case, dies from the flu every year): in such cases the Coronavirus was essentially a “contribution”, but not the real cause. < see sources >
■ in 2020 national Health-care Systems made decisions which caused serious damage.
○ it was decided to sacrifice the elderly, the truly vulnerable, instead of protecting them.
One of the “mistakes” produced by the wrong policies of Institutions, was to decide to sacrifice the elderly – instead of protecting them, as a civil society should have done – the most vulnerable individuals. <see “The sacrifice of the elderly: Doctors have the power to sentence a person to death< see sources >
○ the lack of autopsies (another serious “mistake”) prevented us from understanding that the causes of death were not pneumonia, but an aneurysm. Because of this, oxygen was given under pressure in intensive care, which caused the patients’ veins to rupture (death). < see sources >
■ The data also show how some factors of “modern Progress” – linked to new government and market policies – have led to an aggravation of the consequences of the Coronavirus infection (of the annual flu).
Investigating why Bergamo and Wuhan were the two cities with the highest number of deaths, it emerges that:
● Bergamo (Italy) and Whuan were the two cities with the highest number of deaths.
● Whuan is the first city in the world to have adopted the G5 extensively, as well as mandatory influenza vaccination. Bergamo for the first year had applied a mass vaccination.
