pop-sub-cat: source-main

10 posts

sources: the danger of the second wave of Covid-19 and the arrival of a vaccine have no scientific basis

● Dr. Ron Paul, Former US Congressman – The Ron Paul Institute – «There was a “spike” in coronavirus “cases” they claimed. Funny, just a month or so ago they were demanding that we massively increase testing, which would produce just that “spike” in coronavirus cases they are now using to scare authorities into reinstating the incredibly destructive stay-at-home orders. … There are no “hot spots” […]

sources: the improbability of the creation of a vaccine for Covid-19

«Seventeen years after the (Sars) outbreak and seven years since the first Middle East respiratory syndrome (Mers) case, there is still no coronavirus vaccine despite dozens of attempts to develop them.» (There was no vaccine for Sars or Mers. Will there be one for the new coronavirus? – South China Morning Post) ● “Why we might not get a coronavirus vaccine “ the Guardian – «Why […]

sources: The virus clinically no longer exists

● Science Direct, 2020 May 13 – A study on infectivity of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers We report here a case of the asymptomatic patient and present clinical characteristics of 455 contacts, which aims to study the infectivity of asymptomatic carriers. … we conclude that the infectivity of some asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers might be weak. <see Article> ● “In reality, the virus clinically no longer exists in […]

sources: Children are not at risk at all: they do not get sick and do not transmit the disease

● Financiat Times: “Effects of coronavirus in children adds to list of Covid-19 unknowns” – « … why children exhibit such mild forms of a virus that has killed almost 265,000 people around the world remains unclear. “Right now it’s still a big mystery,” said Isabella Eckerle, a virologist at the Geneva Centre for Emerging Viral Diseases. “We don’t know what’s going on with the children. […]

sources: Institutions Resist to give up “measures”

● Apr 27, 2020 – the video of Dr. Dan Erickson, with which he confirms – with population tests – the data provided by other important medical institutions that show that Coronavirus is a normal annual flu, has been removed from YouTube because it contradicts what was said by W.H.O. (which, for its part. continues to provide incorrect information since the beginning of the epidemic). <read […]

►sources: Data is “manipulated” according to the “guidelines” (+ false cause of death: pre-existing conditions)

● the CDC (US health protection agency) imposes to falsify the “death certificates” «Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there is actual testing to confirm that’s the case. Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be […]

source: The data is false (from the beginning)

The institutional data available since the beginning of the Society lockdown phase made it possible to understand how these measures were not necessary at all ● already on February 22nd (in Italy the closure of commercial activities begins on March 12th) the Director of the most important Italian Coronavirus Analysis Laboratory declares that based on the data in her possession Coronavirus is “”We swapped an infection […]

sources: Coronavirus disease is a normal flu [early studies]

 ● Countries that, like South Korea and Taiwan, were the first to be affected by the epidemic, and have solved the problem in the quickest and most effective way: it is a normal flu [see “Coronavirus cases have dropped sharply in South Korea. What’s the secret to its success?” – sciencemag.org] ● the most authoritative sources such as the Scientists who faced the spread of the […]

sources: Measures more damage than the epidemic of Coronavirus

As early as March 17th on the New York Times «The irony of successful social distancing is that fewer will develop immunity. That means that social distancing 2.0, 3.0 and, who knows, maybe even 4.0 will very likely have to occur. The next round of social distancing will be activated more rapidly, because officials — and the public — will be more prepared. It should also […]