Facts emerge: institutions
have made big mistakes in addressing the Coronavirus epidemic.
Mistakes that cost very dearly
in terms of public health and safety.
The new emergency measures are taken on the basis of assumptions that have no scientific basis.
And these measures create serious damage to the economy and to people's health since the "pandemic" is now over.
● the thesis of the danger of the second wave: this danger does not exist because, as many virologists indicate, with the knowledge acquired in recent months a possible second wave (which no one is able to predict with certainty) can be faced without major problems (certainly emergency measures create greater damage). < see sources > <read more>
● Furthermore, those who argue that it is necessary to resume a normal life it is necessary to wait for the vaccine, argues the false: after seventeen years of research a vaccine for previous "Covid" has not been found, from from a scientific point of view, the Covid-19 vaccine appears to be unworkable.
The sense of alarm is also due to the manipulation of the data provided by the institutions:
● the data are "manipulated" according to the institutions - the death statistics are calculated on the basis of the sick and not, like the other years, on the entire population. In this way, enormously higher figures appear. - < see sources ><more text >
● The data is false from the beginning -The decision to implement lockdowns was based on false measures. Later the most authoritative scientific sources showed that it was a normal flu (0.1% of deaths), but the data of the Governative Institutions indicated vastly higher figures. < see sources > < read more>
There was no difference in deaths from the epidemic between the closed and open States.
Today - by continuing to provide false data - measures are maintained that themselves produce catastrophic consequences for citizens (including additional deaths not due to Coronavirus).
The lockdown imposed on citizens is a measure inspired by Communist China, which consists of a "home arrest". Actually they are a "preventive arrest" to prevent one person from causing harm to others: but almost the majority of people are not even suspected of being infected!
The Constitutions of Western Democracy do not allow the suspension of fundamental human freedoms: in this case the Constitutions were suspended in the name of subjective consideration (of people who have proven themselves incompetent, if not in bad faith).more text
OTHER ISSUES & FALSEHOOD
An analysis of some of the catastrophic problems and false information by institutions.
MEDICINE BASIC CONCEPTS
To understand what really happened, we need to know some medical aspects of the matter.
You cannot kill a virus simply because it is not alive.
The virus can be countered:
● strengthening the organism (as Homeopathy does, for example): the virus does not take root in a healthy organism (keeping people confined in the house, forced to eat supermarket-food, make people weaker and attackable by the virus).
● inhibiting certain functions of the organism - as Institutional Medcine does - so that the cells do not collaborate with the virus. However, this is a way that puts a strain on the patient's body (it is a kind of poisoning).
Because of this characteristic of the virus, vaccines are expected today, which, however, in the current state of science, are almost impossible to carry out (see next point).
Institutional sources reveal that the treatment of the institutional Medicine very often creates serious damage to the patient (leading to his death).
The number of such deaths in hospitals is actually staggering: for example, in the USA, hospital deaths caused by institutional medicine are the third cause of total deaths (annual deaths are 250,000, much higher than those from road accidents). see Sources
That is, every year there are at least 3,000 deaths per month in hospitals due to errors, but today them are not taken into account in the statistics of coronavirus deaths see more
Vaccines for the flu virus are almost impossible to create (vaccines are highly specific, if the virus changes, the vaccine is inneffective): ● this virus changes continuously and therefore - since it takes months of work since a virus is discovered - when the vaccine is ready the virus has already changed (and the vaccine is ineffective) ● the virus is "intelligent" and over the years it has become increasingly capable of resisting vaccines (it is a bit of a problem with antibiotics, the use of which creates increasingly resistant bacteria).
Now that the situation is cleared up – Coronavirus is only a normal influence - there are two fundamental reactions from the Institutions and the People:
● those who thought there was a real emergency UNJUSTIFIABLY INSIST THAT STRONG MEASURES SUCH AS THE SOCIETY LOCKDOWN SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE FOLLOWED.
● those who have understood that an emergency that has never existed has invented, BEGINS TO TAKE ACTION TO RECOVER A SITUATION OF "NORMALITY" - acting in this way contravenes the "Emergency Laws".
daily progress news [by HOLISTICA]
So what do we have to do now?
The institutions have produced enormous damage to populations (both from a health and a social point of view). Now the question is to investigate what has happenedso that this does not happen again.● see more WHAT TO DO NOW?
There are concrete “evidences” of the safety (and practicability) of the reopening of the Society:
► by the development of the epidemic of the countries in which a Society lockdown has not been implemented. see Sources.
► by W.H.O. himself which admits that the Swedish model is the one to follow (Sweden has not implemented the lockdown).● see more Why the reopening has proven to be safe (and necessary)
What responsibilities do governments have? see more
It is necessary to clarify how this could have happened - by investigating in depth - to understand how we can prevent this from happening again. see more● see more The need to attribute responsibility to the institutions
How many days are lost for a return to normal?
For how many days it has been scientifically proven that the Conornavurus problem did not exist (March 30, 2020), and therefore the state of emergency for the Society should have ceased. see Sources
A scientific communication
that could not be ignored is that
published on March 30 2020 by a group of Scientists on Lancet
(Wikipedia: "It is among the world's oldest, most prestigious, and best known general medical journals."): a study that reveals that "The death rate from COVID-19 is likely around 0.66%" Live Science - <see Source>
It should also be borne in mind that it was already known that .66% would further decrease significantly as tests were carried out on the population (in fact after a few days it was found that the death rate was 0.1%).
In fact, this had been known for a long time, since South Korea and Taiwan - which had just successfully overcome the epidemic - had communicated that it was a normal flu.
● already on February 22nd (in Italy the closure of commercial activities begins on March 12th) the Director of the most important Italian Coronavirus Analysis Laboratory declares that based on the data in her possession Coronavirus is “"We swapped an infection just more serious than a flu for a lethal pandemic: it's not like that, look at the numbers" - <read Article>
● subsequently, on March 20, on New York times David L. Katz, the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center: «The data from South Korea, where tracking the coronavirus has been by far the best to date, indicate that as much as 99 percent of active cases in the general population are "mild" and do not require specific medical treatment. " - <read Article>
On March 17 we knew that «The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher. … Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 woluld be 0.125%. But since this estimate is based on extremely thin data the real death rate could stretch from five times lower (0.025%) to five times higher (0.625%).» < read article >
● March 18, it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>