It is necessary to draw lessons from the experience of the actions of the Left in the first three years of the Trump administration.
As illustrated in this article, it is necessary to:
► Understand WHAT is going on in reality (beyond what appear to be tactical skirmishes). What is happening is a process of transformation of Democracy implemented according to the indications of A. Gramsci and his successors such as Saul Alinsky (a kind of soft coup develop with an underground process which is difficult to have a clear perception of).
► Understand WHY this is happening (what are their motives, and the hidden strategies behind their actions – the Left has an undeclared but readable ideological program on the texts on which leftist politicians are trained).
What must be taken into account when dealing with people who follow an ideology – like the people of the Left – is that they are unable to reason. Such people live in fact in an “emotional bubble” in which they strive to stick to orders given by someone (that is, they are driven by a condition of resentment – fomented by someone – which makes them unable to grasp any rational observation).
► Understanding what needs to be done to counter this process of transforming Democracy into a form of real Socialism.
The Left has developed its strategies for transforming Democracy to the point that today it is no longer a question of defending Democracy, but it is necessary:
● to counteraCt to neutralize their “revolution” of the Democratic System (while remaining, in this action, strictly anchored to the principles of Democracy).
● and subsequently re-establish the institutional instruments of Democracy.
THE PROBLEM: THE TRANSFORMATION PROCESS CARRIED OUT BY THE LEFT
So the fundamental question is to become aware of the fact that
the Left, for almost a century,
has been carrying out
a gradual but radical transformation of Democracy.
The basis of the transformation process implemented by the Left
In order to intervene by countering the action of the Left to transform Democracy, it is therefore crucial
to have a vision of what this process is based on.
The current action of the Left is based, at a theoretical level, on the indications of:
Marx, who understood how it was possible to exploit the People (at that time was the Proletariat, today are the minorities who can be convinced of suffering injustice).
This thought has spread in many forms but it remains present in the substance of the thought of the Left (Wilson, the Cabinet of Roosevelt, Obama, the Democratic Party of the new millennium, etc …).
Some followers of Marx’s thought then developed strategies for applying Marx’s ideas:
Lev Trotsky understood how there should be an international collaboration between the Socialist National forces (the globalization currently underway is an example of this idea – it should be taken into account that the ‘UN was born out of a proposal by US President Woodrow Wilson).
Antonio *Gramsci who understands how the creation of a Socialist regime must be done by gradually transforming the culture of a nation (eliminating Religions, taking possession of the School and the Media). And therefore appropriating the effective powers of Democracy (government institutions, judiciary, etc.).
Saul Alinsky who provided some basic operating principles to the Left, which Hillary Clinton and Obama said were among their key references. And that today are at the basis of the strategies of Democratic Politicians, of movements such as Antifa, Civil Rights, LGBT etc …
We must not forget the practical action developed so far by the left-wing politicians who obtained the presidency of the United States.
Woodrow Wilson from his thesis on the need to establish Socialism in Democracy (“Socialism and Democracy”) he has passed a first transformation of Democracy, centralization of powers and bringing the Society into an economic dimension (the Idea of Socialism, as it has Lenin pointed out, and as we tend to ignore today, is that it can be spread only through the tools of Capitalism: Socialism is not in fact against Capitalism in itself, but it is against the Free market; that is, Socialism is for a Capitalism managed by the State ).
Wilson’s policy led, among other things, to the global Government instrument (UN) and to the economic crisis exploited by Roosevelt to win the elections (and therefore to progress decisively in the process of socialist transformation of Democracy).
F.D. Roosevelt (the first truly Communist cabinet) adopted radical Socialism measures: the advanced welfare system, in which the State directly paid the unemployed workers (the saying was: we pay some to dig holes, and then we pay others to close them). And he created new institutions to provide “a home for all” that were the origin of the economic crisis that Obama exploited to win the election.
Obama (the first to claim to be inspired by the teachings of radical Socialists) has transformed Democracy into a Socialist Democracy (at least in the basics, leaving the project in the middle – if this project is not canceled, Democracy continues to tend to become real Socialism ).
Obama acted on the main institutions, Justice, School, Parliament, Intelligence, IRS, Bureaucracy and the role of the President (Obama, as President, said that he could act through Executive Orders because Parliament does not have “common sense”).
What operated by the Left is a “transformation of the political and institutional structures without strong social processes.” of which there is no perception, because it develops through many generations. And because it is developed underground.
One of the strengths of this campaign of appropriation of the institutions is in the ability to convince people with particularly effective communication. In fact, it happens that even most Journalists use the manipulated terms of the Left narrative, also involuntarily helping the spread of their propaganda redericks (it is the case of Foxnews journalists who spoke of Trump’s Impeachment when iin reality it was something else entirely).
Most of the people do not realize this appropriation of the institutions by the Left because now the millennials lack a real Culture – thanks to the “reforms” of the School – and, for example, think that real Socialism is a model ideal of Society.
In summary, the occult strategies of the Left envisage developing a transformation of the various strategic sectors for the management of power in society.
First of all, for the Left it is a question of eliminating Culture in order to make it easier for people to believe in the narrative produced by the Left (see the case of Obama’s Production who won the Oscar with in 2020 a “documentary” on Communism ).
So le Left works on sectors
● School: the transformation of the school serves to prepare the ground for the appropriation of the institutions (of power).
Then a transformation of “effective powers” of modern Democracy is implemented (which, although not recognized at the institution level as official Powers, allow to exercise considerable power over the Government):
● Media: thanks to the intervention of compliant media, narrative becomes reality. So the falsehoods pronounced by the Left Politicians become credible (in the same way the truth becomes a fake).
● Judiciary: the “armed wing” that replaces the armies in the most recent Socialism coups.
● Bureaucracy: the government sector that assumes ever greater power, and allows, in fact, to govern with people not elected by citizens.
Thanks to the strategies mentioned above
the Left is operating
(with good results)
to alter the foundation of Democracy.
But in addition to these strategies, the Left having perfected very sophisticated specific tactics, is leading a strong attack on the pivotal tool of representative Democracy, the vote. Indeed:
– the vote expressed by citizens today can be overturned by new tools created ad hoc by the Left, such as fake Impeachment.
– the vote is increasingly altered at the origin with various election fraud tactics.
Today the Republicans should ask themselves how much the next elections will be influenced: ● by the vote of people convicted of felonies ● by non-citizens who have been given driving licenses ● by the media aggression that supports some type of (invented) guilt of Republican candidates (keep in mind that the Democrats aim to block the President by taking control of the Senate) ● from more traditional electoral fraud, such as those perpetrated by Acorn ● by Jerrymanding, etc …
For this reason, it is necessary immediately to start preparing law enforcement actions against these frauds with which the Left is transforming Democracy into a real Socialism regime.
THE PATH OF RESTORATION OF DEMOCRACY
The real problem for U.S. Democracy
seems to be the unconsciousness
of the part of the Conservatives,
on the direction in which the Democratic Party is operating.
Politicians and journalists in fact smile when they see the failure of the specific tactical actions of the Left. But
they do not realize that
in reality we are only at the beginning of a process
that can have very serious consequences.
That is, the Conservatives do not realize that the Left, thanks to the cultural and political pre-conditions that it has established, in reality does not suffer any defeat: it is able to use its apparent failures to develop the basic strategy with greater energy of seizing Power through ways not provided for by the Constitution and the Laws.
See the example of fake-Impeachment, which served the Left, among other things, to win two governors, and thanks to the “media pillory” of the narrative of fake-testimony, to create in the collective imagination the idea that Trump is operating out of the rules (most people only know the truth of the New York Times, CNN, etc …).
The unawareness of what is really happening causes the Conservatives to see a “game of politics” in current affairs, and they do not realize that in reality it is a game played completely outside the rules.
It is necessary to realize that
it is in place
a gradual coup
that is leading Democracy
towards real Socialism
(Gramsci argues that it is possible to carry out a “passive revolution” with which to gradually take possession of the institutions, without the people being able to identify in this action the establishment of a form of real Socialism).
One of the points that must include the essence of “Left Thought”:
– in the long run –
inevitably lead to real Socialism.
That is, there is no form of Left Politics which, if applied for a while, does not lead to real Socialism. <see The tendency of Left Politics to real Socialism>
It is therefore necessary to take immediate action
if you don’t want to allow the Democrats,
with their shrewd illegal methods,
use the 2020 elections
to further strengthen their power
(note that it is not a matter of guaranteeing the regular election of the President: for them obtaining control of the Senate would represent an absolute victory).
WHAT IS POSSIBLE TO DO?
It is therefore necessary to kick off ad
a season of Democratic corrective reforms
that leads to neutralization
of the transformation process
of emocracy in real socialism
Firstly, it is necessary to realize that it is not (anymore) a matter of protecting Democracy (for example, protecting Parliament, National Security Agencies, Elections).
the “transformation of the institutions”
has reached such a level that
it is necessary to start unhinging
the forms of illegitimate power
conquered by the Democrats
The fact is that by now the mechanisms of politics are so transformed that it is no longer possible to simply defend the institutions. But it is necessary to rebuild what has been destroyed.
The process of appropriation of the institutions by the Left has succeeded, step by step, in transforming Democracy by forcing the mechanisms of Politics so as to create “precedents”, due to which citizens have gradually accepted the new conditions as a given done.
In this process of transformation of the institutions, little is left of Democracy: the Rules have changed meaning, the Institutions have been infiltrated by partisan (from political institutions such as Parliament and the Judiciary; to private ones such as the Media, the Oscar, the Nobel), the election itself has become a fraud, etc …
In general we can say that the cure consists in
in its real dimension
only by restoring, at the base,
the Principles and Instruments of Democracy,
it is possible to neutralize
the currently developed process of the Democrats.
The fact is that today only by immediately creating tools that can allow the development of governance processes typical of Democracy, is it possible to counter, like they hit, the subversive tactics of the Left.
It is necessary to take into account that only by acting with the active support of citizens, it is possible to neutralize the actions of the Left. So in order to develop an effective “counter-revolution” it is necessary to:
● develop Media capable of restoring the actual truth about what is happening.
● develop Government tools participated by Citizens (only in this way is there a legitimacy that allows to neutralize the actions of the Left).
The precondition for this counter-reform is
oust the Democrats
from the illegitimate position of power
obtained from them
A warning: as illustrated below, in this action it is necessary to follow the principles of Democracy, otherwise, placing oneself on the same level as the Left, solid and lasting results cannot be obtained.
A step back, and two steps forward: an evolution of the instruments of Democracy
In reality it is a question of doing much more than a reconstruction of the instruments of Democracy as they were originally.
Today, in fact, thanks to the development of the new Communication Technologies, it is possible not only to restore the original Democracy of the USA. But it is also possible to improve the tools for expressing the will of citizens.
These new tools allow Democracy to be closer to its original principles (and, first of all, to the principle illustrated below: the People and Sovereign, and therefore decisions are always and in any case up to it).
That is, it is necessary to take a step back (restore the tools of Democracy), and then take two steps forward (improve these tools).
Improving the democracy of the institutions means passing (even gradually)
from Representative Democracy
Basically today it is possible to build a Democracy that approaches the original model (which in reality is the only form of Democracy that has actually worked in History): an “administrative” system in which Citizens are directly involved.
In reality, this is the condition in which the US Democracy was originally, since the administration of the territory was managed directly by the inhabitants of the small Towns.
The problem arose with due to two factors: ● the creation of the federal state; and ● the concentration of the population of large cities.
Because of these phenomena, the participation of citizens in politics has become practically impossible (such factors – the growth of the populations of the metropolis; and the centralization of power – have created the need to create the institution that allows the Left to take possession of the institutions: Representative Democracy).
But today a new factor allows to implement a truly Disrutpive Innovation of the mechanisms of Democracy: it is the development of technologies at a level that
it allows you to create
radically new tools
that make modern Democracy a quantum leap.
That is, it allows us to bring representative Democracy closer to real Democracy (Participated or Direct). <See The need for participation in the Public Administration and Participation: What it is and what it is not (use the translate button)>
With the new tools, for example, Citizens can be called to express their choices much more frequently than today – in this case it is a sort of Democracy strongly based on Referendums, as it is for Switzerland.
Obviously, this possibility of consulting Citizens directly must be linked to the spread of correct information capable of contrasting the narrative of the Left
It should be remembered that it is not a question of opposing a force equal to and contrary to that of the (and hidden) revolution implemented by the Left, but it is a question of applying strictly Democratic methods, in the fundamental idea that
the End is the principle
That is, if you want to get to restore true Democracy, you must use strictly democratic methods.
The Left has never managed to establish a condition of social peace precisely because the transformation process it has implemented is based on top-down decisions (and therefore on the need to “force” citizens to follow these decisions).
This should be done for at least two reasons.
► to block the strategies of the Left it is necessary to have citizenship support. For this reason it is necessary to bring Citizens back to a condition of participation in the Government.
Democracy is in crisis precisely because of the problem that citizens have lost the habit (and therefore the ability) to govern themselves. And the Left exploits this condition of the Citizens to appropriate the Institutions.
► it is necessary to be unassailable, in order not to be delegitimized in the action of contrasting the strategies of the Left.
The Left develops its strategies by systematically transgressing the rules of the system in which it moves (Democracy). Since in order to counter these strategies it is necessary to leverage the illegitimacy of this position, it is necessary to abide by the rules of the democratic system.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN, OPERATIVELY SPEAKING, TO RESTORE THE REAL DEMOCRACY?
In order to develop an effective contrast to the gradual cultural revolution underway, then
1) it is necessary to be aware of what left-wing Thought is – its natural (inescapable) tendency to develop the condition of Real Socialism (working behind the scenes on long-term programs).
That is, you need to realize that
we are faced with people who
do not develop rational strategies,
but only tactics motivated by an emotional impulse
(a resentment towards what is against them, which leads them to want to destroy any form of pre-established institutions – the Democratic institutions).
It is also crucial to understand that they base their legitimacy on a narrative that has taken on people thanks to their appropriation of the Media (and school education).
2) it is necessary to be aware of what Democracy really is – what are the conditions of good functioning, and the conditions of vulnerability – in order to better define the path of restoration of Democracy.
That is, it is a matter of understanding how the participation of the Citizens in every single step of the process is at the basis of the functioning of Democracy. Obviously it must be a conscious participation.
For this reason it is necessary to develop information channels that allow to counter the falsehoods continually enunciated by the Left.
(It is about creating a new generation of Media with “Social” features – in the studio by GovtWatchDog – that can make a qualitative leap compared to channels such as FoxNews and Breitbart)
It is very important to develop an awareness of what Democracy is, to understand what its weak points are (where it is most vulnerable to attacks by the Left), and its strengths (in what Democracy must be strengthened so that its processes do not may come more, forced as it happens now).
Democracy’s strength is basically
in Citizen Participation
The consequences of the lack of participation
Participation (i.e. the condition in which Citizens actively participate in the specific decisions affecting the social community) is the condition that allows Democracy to function in its fundamental purpose: the satisfaction of Citizens’ needs.
● participation allows for an optimal administration of the Society (effective services and structures).
This is because
are the best designers of solutions
to satisfy those needs
(perhaps with the support of someone else: but no person, however “enlightened”, can understand the complexity of a need, and therefore develop valid solutions).
● participation allows citizens to maintain an effective awareness of their skills – as witnessed by two centuries of administration of provincial towns – to personally manage the administration of their social community.
The consequences of lack of awareness
The weakness of Democracy
it is basically
in the loss of awareness of the Citizens
of their role
When Citizens – as it is now especially for those who live in metropolises – are in this condition of absence of awareness, it happens that
● as in ancient Athens, a demagogic dimension develops in which Politicians can say anything, and Citizens take it for real.
This was possible thanks to decades of “cultural revolution” carried out at various levels by cultural Marxism, which led people to a loss of direct perception of the reality of things (it is the sort of mental bubble, a term with which Soviet dissidents they indicated the condition of unawareness of the people who lived in the communist regime).
In this condition the Citizen is no longer able to evaluate things, and to “understand” what is “right” it needs interpretations (today most people are no longer able to interpret the facts, and for this reason reason they follows the Left media that offer not information but “explanations”)
In the current condition of unawareness, a level of demagogy develops which allows Obama and Sanders (in his election program) to affirm that Parliament lacks “common sense”, and therefore that they are morally justified in making direct decisions, with Executive Order .
● The consequence of the action developed by the Left in the last century
has led Citizens to be truly convinced
of not being able to manage one’s life,
and therefore to depend on the “experts”
(not only the politicians, but also, for example, the doctors to whom people feel they have to turn to the slightest ailment, and the psychologists who are thought to be necessary to solve existential problems, etc …).
In the final analysis, leftist strategies have managed to put citizens in a situation of strong dependence on institutions that ensure “security” for them (note that this security is often not real, but only imaginary).
In this situation, Citizens depend totally on others as regards not only the satisfaction of their needs, but also the decisions to be made about their life (and therefore the “political” choices).
Note that in some countries, as in Italy, the word employee is translated as dependent (the same as one for addicted)
It is this situation of dependence that allows politicians to propose citizens to accept the top-down solutions typical of leftist strategies (this approach is also adopted today by most republican politicians).
The question is that
is the only true Democracy.
That is, if citizens are not directly involved in the management of the social community in which they live, the government regime tends to become increasingly detached from the real needs of citizens.
This occurs for several reasons:
● the holders of needs are the only ones who can develop effective solutions for themselves (as has always happened in the ancient villages, and in the USA in the provincial town).
● Citizens, by delegating the actions to manage the needs of their social community, lose contact with reality.
● who assumes the Power “by delegation” by the Citizens, exploiting the small autonomy of power attributed to it, uses this power to develop other tools that gradually expand its initial power (in this way the rise of the Left Parties takes place – or more generally of the establishment).
As for the current form of democracy, we must consider – observing history – that
has never worked.
Representative Democracy has always degenerated into Socialism: the fact is that representative Democracy rests on bases that are essentially Socialist. So representative democracy is in itself a form of socialism in a nutshell
the two false justifications for social democracy
In the first place, the legitimacy of the power of the Left is in the false idea that underlies representative Democracy: the “social contract”. According to this idea, Citizens voluntarily granted part of their power that the Constitution assigns to them (Citizens in Democracy are Sovereign, that is, no one can stand “above them”).
This concept was invented during the French Revolution: but such a contract does not exist. No citizen was asked if he wanted to join this contract; and it is not possible to withdraw from this “contract” (the fact is that from a legal point of view it cannot exist such a contract since it defines a form of slavery).
Secondly, Democracy is not representative at all (according to the Laws of Democracy, the relationship between Citizen and Member of Parliament cannot be defined as a representation), since:
● the Citizen does not actually choose the people who will represent him: (but “chooses” among an extremely limited number of people already chosen by others).
● the Citizen does not have a precise action program by the Candidate (a contract that he undertakes to respect), but only a generic promise of intent
● the Citizen cannot communicate with his Representative during the mandate; that is, the Citizen does not have the means of making suggestions to its Representative (who therefore is unable to know the opinion of Citizens regarding the laws it votes for). Furthermore, the citizen has no possibility of verifying the action of the Representative.
● the Citizen cannot revoke the mandate from the Representative (even when the latter completely reverses the route, going from one political alignment to another).
in the current Democracy the “elected” politicians
place themselves “above the laws”.
This is precisely the factory defect of representative Democracy.
<see European democracy is not even a real Representative Democracy (use translate button)>
The advantage of the USA over Europe is that in this Nation real (direct) Democracy has survived to this day in the administration of little towns. And therefore there remains in a part of the citizens the awareness of what a real Democracy is.
The fact is that Democracy was born in Athens based on the direct participation of Citizens (it is the Demos, the people, that rules). And that without an active participation in the Government of the social community of the people who make it up, there is no Democracy at all.
when Democracy needs to be restored,
this cannot be done, at the base of everything,
without restoring Citizen participation
in Government/Administration matters.
in the end,
participatory Democracy tools are probably,
the only effective weapon,
in countering the “revolutionary” government actions
of the Democrats.
(it is the only way to remove the legitimacy they themselves attribute to their actions).
In order to develop effective “counter-reform” strategies towards the transformation already carried out by the Left, it is obviously not enough to know well the strengths and vulnerabilities of Democracy. It is also necessary to know the fundamental characteristics of the way people think and act on the Left.
In this regard, it is first of all necessary to understand that there are two levels of the “being of the Left”. The level of the activist, and that of the sympathizer.
This happens because one of the fundamental qualities of the leftist ideology is that it is hidden in most of its dogma (Socialism comes from Freemasonry).
For this reason, the leaders of the left parties know both the methods and the purpose of their actions. While sympathizers are attracted to the Left Demagogy because it stands as a “savior” with respect to their problems (see the case of Millenials who think that Communism is a form of Democracy).
Some characteristics of the Left Activists are illustrated below (i.e. a part of the Politicians, Authors, Journalists, Professors of the Left).
● strengths of the Left
Left Activists are masters in Demagogy. They know how to use the “brainwashing” techniques once adopted in the communist countries (USSR and Mao China).
the Left is able to develop
– occultly –
the cultural revolution described by Orwell
based solely on narrative.
(Recall that Orwell fought the Spanish Civil War for real Socialism, and knew the problems of such ideology at his own expense).
Thanks to this quality, the Left can afford not to have any real political program, but only a demagoguery made of slogans that take hold on the emotional level.
In this way, the Left politicians get the support (polls, elections) from people who are caught by their demagoguery (most of the big cities, in which the strategies of “transformation of Democracy” have been applied for decades) .
It is necessary to realize the power of their narrative. For example, they manage to make believe that a state-run medical insurance system is better than a private one.
Note the power of these strategies: the Left uses the problems that arise because of their actions, to attribute the causes to the opponents.
There are therefore two qualities of the Left that allow it to gradually develop a transformation of Democracy in the direction of Socialism:
● the high level of his demagogy: that is
from the “Cultural revolution” of the Left
brought a large part of the Citizens
to consider legitimate
actions totally out of the rules
(decidedly illegal) based on strategies aimed at real Socialism (Gramsci, Alinsky, etc …)
● ability to infiltrate institutions by people who aim to make it an instrument for transforming democracy into a form of socialism.
● weaknesses of the Left
The luck of the Citizens is that
the qualities that make Left Politicians very powerful are also the qualities that make them extremely vulnerable.
Their peculiar characteristics prove to be, in the long run, manufacturing defects that lead them to ruin.
Be careful, however, that the Left can only be beaten when its strategies are rooted out, because otherwise only defeats are produced which the Left serves to strengthen its position.
The problem of people on the Left, seen at a more general level, is that they live in an “ideological bubble” (which is an emotional bubble, in which no content is actually rational), and therefore
they build their actions on nothing
(the critical issue for the Left is that any of its actions lacks real foundations, links with actual reality, support for a project and effective planning: it all boils down to the level of demagogy, of slogans)
This represents their basic problem:
between the person of the Left and reality
a gap is created
to grow with the evolution of the actions
The fact is that this distance between them and reality continually creates conflicts with actual reality; and therefore, to cover these problems, they are forced to take the debate to an even more abstract level (in this way they can, for example, attribute responsibility for these problems to others; or in any case divert the attention of the Public by encouraging the hatred towards opponents).
This is their approach
abstract compared to actual reality
it produces a vicious circle that at some point
leads to the collapse of the castle of abstractions (falsehoods) produced by them.
The strategies of the Left Politicians can develop for a long time because they obtain the consent of the “sympathizers” who – by continuing to read the fake news of the Media – do not realize what actually happens (the “sympathizers” do not realize what the Left’s responsibilities are actually in social problems).
But the strategies of the Left are inevitably destined to fail, because if the Left – in its path of evolution of Politics towards Socialism – cannot make a leap towards Real Socialism (the dictatorship in which they no longer need popular consensus) the problems become so exacerbated that them are no longer physically bearable by the population.
Note that social problems – such as poverty – were created specifically by the Left: the goal of Marxism is precisely to exacerbate a part of the population so that it rebels to help the Left to appropriate it with the strength of the institutions.
The problem of the Left is that in countries where Democracy is deeply rooted, it cannot make the qualitative leap towards real Socialism (the armed Revolution), and therefore when the social problems – created by it – become unsustainable for the population it loses consensus (this problem does not exist, for example, in Venezuela, where the Socialist dictatorship is “mature”).
It is also recalled that Roosevelt, using the Big Deal state of emergency as an excuse, sent the State Police to the Citizens’ houses to seize their gold).
The problem of the Left is therefore that, when it approaches the creation of a form of real Socialism, it systematically collapses in a catastrophic way in the consensus, and must give up the positions of power hitherto conquered (a significant example of this is Sweden , a country in which forms of real Socialism – such as that of O. Palme who said to follow the example of Pol Pot and Castro – are followed by periods of government by the Conservatives).
An example of the problems that the Left encounters in trying to transform Democracy according to the canons of Socialism, but without being able to establish the rigid rules of dictatorship, is in the escape from the country of Companies (and of the most qualified people).
While in the cases of mature real Socialism, it is possible to prevent this escape, as it was in the German Democratic Republic: in this Nation it was possible to maintain a long social condition of poverty since anyone who tried to expatriate was killed by snipers.
The positive aspect of the question (for Democracy) is that by knowing these flaws thoroughly
you can speed this up
failure of the long-term strategies of the Left.