We recommend vision on computer, the site is not optimized for smartphones!
(Click on yellow numbers to see in-depth)
SUPPORT THE THESIS OF THE DANGER OF COVID-19 1Carefully consulting any institutional source (OMS, CDC, …) it emerges that there is no scientific proof.
On the contrary the data that demonstrate how Covid-19 is no more dangerous than a normal flu derive from important scientific research (statistics, medical and biological).
<“Covid as normal flu”>
The absence of scientific justification for anti-covid strategies, and the falsity of the information disclosed by the media
serious mistakes are made on Covid-19 by the instituTions
● IT'S JUST A NORMAL INFLUENCE:
- the Authorities in the medical field declared it 2Today the institutions speak of danger, but they themselves deny with objective data. <see>
<Coronavirus timeline >
- data on the problems created by Covid-19 are highly incorrect 3Many are the "mistakes" committed from the point of view of data analysis, institutional information policies and treatments.
<Errors in treatments>
● THE SITUATION IS FURTHER IMPROVED,
- but Institutions continue to disclose phoney data4Today the situation is much better than in the "first wave" because there is a better knowledge of the Virus. And it is possible to apply effective treatments and new strategies so as not to burden national health systems, and not to block the Society. < see >
- the Covid problem in Sweden and China do not exist! 5In Sweden the problem has never existed, and in China the cases are practically nil (and there is no longer any measure).<see>
The question of vaccinations: false problems and false information
Now the problem is vaccinations: the same "mistakes" are made in the evaluation of Covid-19 (and in the definition of anti-Covid strategies).
(click on the title bars ("+") to open the content)
First you need to specify that
denying (falsely) the existence of effective treatments Covid-19 is the only way to authorize Vaccinations
(such cures exist, and they heal the sick with the same percentages of a normal flu: 99.9%. Seeing the statistics, they do it much better than vaccinations).
For any important disease, the strategies used by the medical institutions to deal with Covid are deadly: waiting for the disease to worsen without doing anything, and then obtaining a hospitalization as a desperate attempt to save the patient (moreover, the Tachipirina recommended by the institutions has a negative effect, as it lowers the level of fever, which is exactly what the human body uses to kill the virus).
► “How to treat Covid-19” - Ippocrate.org, a group of Doctors who achieved 99.9% success rates.
► “Overcoming Fear: the Way of the Ippocrate Movement” Where the correct treatments for Covid were applied, the deaths were almost nil.
As mentioned, a clue that can make us understand why the institutions hide the possibility of treatment for Covid: the contract for the authorization of vaccinations stipulated between pharmaceutical companies with governments provides that vaccinations can be authorized only in the event that there is no are alternative treatments to them.
Institutions (Government and Medical) affirm that
● vaccinations are used not to avoid becoming infected, but to make the disease less serious.
But in reality this is false:
today the data show that 50% of deaths from Covid are vaccinated.
<► For Second Week in a Row: More COVID-19 Vaccination Deaths than COVID-19 Deaths in the US According to CDC and VAERS Websites“>
Vaccines are not only useless (vaccinated people get infected anyway, and die from Covid), but they have proved to be dangerous for humans.
Vaccinated people die not only from Covid,
BUT ALSO DIE FROM THE VACCINATION ITSELF.
In reality, what are called vaccinations are not at all (Pfizer, Moderna), but they are alleged cures (the consequences of which are not known on humans).
The problem is that these substances modify the genetic information contained in the organs of a person, and this could over time provoke a reaction from the immune system (as happens in the "rejection" of transplanted organs, the immune system could decide to fight – and destroy - the very organism it is supposed to defend).
In other words, the "vaccines" for Covid are an "invention" of the pharmaceutical Companies for which there is no historical experience, and there is still no experimental evidence.
In fact, therefore:
1) the vaccinated act as tester (once in these phases animals were used as guinea pigs).
2) the experimentation is not actually carried out, since during the experimentation, as a rule, what happens in the subject is kept track, but in the current case the regulatory reports are not drawn up (which report complications, deaths, etc. ..).
Deepening of some topics
The seriousness of the situation is not due to a virus,
but to political choices < see full article>
The choices of measures such as masks, spacing and lockdown
are based on purely political criteria
These choices have no scientific data support: for example, the closure of commercial establishments such as restaurants and gyms is not based on any evidence of cases in them.
If some of these measures could make sense in the initial phase of the epidemic, when the power of the virus was not yet known, today they are totally useless, but also highly harmful not only for society, but also for the health of individuals. < see "Errors in treatment and anti-Covid strategies" >
It is the measures that create damage (health and poverty problems) and not the Virus
The choices of politicians and experts who have not understood the essence of Covid have created a lot of damage:
● in the definition of health procedures.
● in defining treatments
● in the management of the Economy
< see “Institutions' responsibility for Covid deaths”>
< see "The “collateral damage” produced by current ideological policies" >
The sense of alarm is also due to the manipulation of the data provided by the institutions:
● the data are "manipulated" according to the institutions - the death statistics are calculated on the basis of the sick and not, like the other years, on the entire population. In this way, enormously higher figures appear. - < see sources ><more text >
● The data is false from the beginning -The decision to implement lockdowns was based on false measures. Later the most authoritative scientific sources showed that it was a normal flu (0.1% of deaths), but the data of the Governative Institutions indicated vastly higher figures. < see sources > < read more>
There was no difference in deaths from the epidemic between the closed and open States.
Today - by continuing to provide false data - measures are maintained that themselves produce catastrophic consequences for citizens (including additional deaths not due to Coronavirus).
The lockdown imposed on citizens is a measure inspired by Communist China, which consists of a "home arrest". Actually they are a "preventive arrest" to prevent one person from causing harm to others: but almost the majority of people are not even suspected of being infected!
The Constitutions of Western Democracy do not allow the suspension of fundamental human freedoms: in this case the Constitutions were suspended in the name of subjective consideration (of people who have proven themselves incompetent, if not in bad faith).more text
Governments and scientific Institutions insist on the need for social lockdown, painting a literally invented dramatic scenario this confirms the lack of scientificity (and good faith) by government and scientific institutions).see Sources - read more
OTHER ISSUES & FALSEHOOD
An analysis of some of the catastrophic problems and false information by institutions.
MEDICINE BASIC CONCEPTS
To understand what really happened, we need to know some medical aspects of the matter.
You cannot kill a virus simply because it is not alive.
The virus can be countered:
● strengthening the organism (as Homeopathy does, for example): the virus does not take root in a healthy organism (keeping people confined in the house, forced to eat supermarket-food, make people weaker and attackable by the virus).
● inhibiting certain functions of the organism - as Institutional Medcine does - so that the cells do not collaborate with the virus. However, this is a way that puts a strain on the patient's body (it is a kind of poisoning).
Because of this characteristic of the virus, vaccines are expected today, which, however, in the current state of science, are almost impossible to carry out (see next point).
Institutional sources reveal that the treatment of the institutional Medicine very often creates serious damage to the patient (leading to his death). The number of such deaths in hospitals is actually staggering: for example, in the USA, hospital deaths caused by institutional medicine are the third cause of total deaths (annual deaths are 250,000, much higher than those from road accidents). see Sources That is, every year there are at least 3,000 deaths per month in hospitals due to errors, but today them are not taken into account in the statistics of coronavirus deaths see more
Vaccines for the flu virus are almost impossible to create (vaccines are highly specific, if the virus changes, the vaccine is inneffective): ● this virus changes continuously and therefore - since it takes months of work since a virus is discovered - when the vaccine is ready the virus has already changed (and the vaccine is ineffective) ● the virus is "intelligent" and over the years it has become increasingly capable of resisting vaccines (it is a bit of a problem with antibiotics, the use of which creates increasingly resistant bacteria).
Is there really a risk of reopening?
Where would the risk of reopening be? 1) when we talk about the increase in the infected, we don't talk about the deaths: it is a normal flu (only 1% of people are at risk, and these people can be protected effectively). see Sources2) after the lockdowm has been implemented, it is obvious that with the reopening the number of infected increases, since by preventing contacts between people the spread of the epidemic has been prevented (the normal influence):…Cronavirus disease is a normal flu (outdated)
● Economist, April 11 2020 “If millions of people were infected weeks ago without dying, the virus must be less deadly than official data suggest,” the magazine determined, using graphs to suggest the faster the disease spreads and hits its peak, the fewer people will die. Silverman and Washburne found that the coronavirus mortality rate could be as low as 0.1 percent, “similar to that of flu” <see Article - Study: Coronavirus Fatality Rate Lower than Expected, Close to Flu's 0.1%>
● February 22nd (in Italy the closure of commercial activities begins on March 12th) the Director of the most important Italian Coronavirus Analysis Laboratory declares that based on the data in her possession Coronavirus is “"We swapped an infection just more serious than a flu for a lethal pandemic: it's not like that, look at the numbers" - <read Article>
● On March 17 «The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher. … Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 woluld be 0.125%. But since this estimate is based on extremely thin data the real death rate could stretch from five times lower (0.025%) to five times higher (0.625%).» <read Article>
● March 20, on New York times David L. Katz, the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center: «The data from South Korea, where tracking the coronavirus has been by far the best to date, indicate that as much as 99 percent of active cases in the general population are "mild" and do not require specific medical treatment. " - <read Article>
● March 18, it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
● Apr 27, 2020 - Dr. Dan Erickson: expanding the number of the population on which he applied the test he found that the data provided by the institutions are incorrect. And the percentage of deaths from Cornonavirus is extremely lower – as an ordinary annual flu (the data have been compared with those of other important medical institutions that have confirmed the data). <read Articles: “Dr. Daniel Erickson says the lockdowns have a minimal impact on containing Coronavirus” - “Tucker (Fox News): Big Tech censors dissent over coronavirus lockdowns”).
The need to attribute responsibility to the institutions
«THE PROTAGONISTS OF THE CATASTROPHE OF THE measures TAKEN FOR THE CORONAVIRUS 2020I REFUSE THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES: the experts say "We didn't make the decisions," the rulers say "it's not our fault because we have been ravaged by incapable consultants"» Salvatore Rainò So that the catastrophe created by the measures of the "Coronavirus 2020 emergency” does not happen again, it is necessary to be able to attribute the responsibilities of these disastrous choices to the Rulers and to the “Experts”who have…
The sacrifice of the elderly: Doctors have the power to sentence a person to death
In practically all countries, governmental institutions have imposed criteria for selecting the people who need to be treated (and therefore those who must be left to die) We must note that care for older people was refused not only for Coronavirus, but was also refused, in general, for visits and surgery (which could have saved such people at the start). As part of the Medicine claims, selecting patients to be treated is not only illegal (in fact doctors are…
What to do now? The need to investigate what it happened to make sure it doesn’t happen again
The facts that emerge from the experience of Coronavirus 2020: ■ the Scientific Commissions (those that are based on truly scientific demonstration processes) have clarified how it was an epidemic of a normal flu (no more dangerous than those of previous years). ■ government institutions have taken measures such as the Society lockdown for no valid reason: the "Coronavirus danger" was already a fake news from the beginning (a pure narrative such as that of the Martian Invasion, invented by…
The development of the Coronavirus 2020 syndrome
The most sensational fact of the whole COVID-19 affair is that the data on the basis of which the drastic measures were taken (Society lockdown) on the occasion of the 2020 Coronavirus epidemic WAS CLEARLY WRONG (as the institutions later admitted) . That is, if we had paid attention to the real data, drastic measures such as the Society lockdown would not have been taken, AND LIFE WOULD BE CONTINUED AS ON THE OCCASION OF ALL THE INFLUENCES of the…
Why are data on Cornonavirus bogus?
The "death toll" is calculated by dividing the number of infected by the number of Coronavirus deaths. But both numbers are wrong: 1) the dead are not all of coronavirus, as the institutions now force doctors to consider coronavirus deaths even when there is only the slightest suspicion - see “CDC Tells Hospitals To List COVID as Cause of Death Even if You're Just Assuming or It Only Contributed "<see> 2) the number of infected people considered is extremely…
Culture Issues: Synopsis
Today Coronavirus* highlights how people expect imposition from top of their behavior, and are unable to make decisions themselves functional to their life . That is people today are no longer able to formulate in their's head an idea of what is right and what is wrong than your health. People today no longer know how to interpret reality: they need explanations from others also about things that concern the most personal aspects of their life, which exposes them to…
COVID-19: WHAT TO DO NOW
Little by little, the fact emerges that the institutions - and the mainstream media - have made big mistakes in addressing the Coronavirus epidemic. Mistakes that cost very dearly in terms of public health and safety. . And, since the damage has already been done, the question now is to investigate what happened so that it doesn't happen again. (investigate both from the point of view of human health, and socially). . That is, it is now necessary to try…
Culture Issues: 1) the lack of a basic scientific Culture: the inability to discern between true and false
Today we live in a socio/cultural situation IN WHICH IT IS POSSIBLE TO DEVELOP A STRONG MANIPULATION OF INFORMATION WHICH DOES NOT ALLOW PEOPLE TO FIND VALID SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION TO UNDERSTAND HOW THINGS REALLY ARE This applies both to citizens and to those responsible for institutions.