Today, the many failures derive precisely from the lack of understanding of the essence of Disruptive innovation: The purpose of the Guidelines is to CLARIFY WHAT THE DISRUTPIVE INNOVATION REALLY IS. You can easily evaluate THE RESPONSE OF A BUSINESS TO THE RULES OF THE DISRUTPIVE INNOVATION
Disruptive Innovation require new Disruptive Criteria. A Table of Keypoints aimed at a diagnostic assessments of Business innovation capacity.
We live in a time of profound social, market and government changes, which are the cause of a profound crisis (social chaos, economic crisis, etc.)….
INTRODUCTION: THE NEED TO CLARIFY THE MEANING OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF THE MARKET (OF THE BUSINESS) Today, most of the big Companies’ strategies are bankrupt….
In developing a strategy of Disruptive innovation WHEN EVEN JUST A PART OF THE “OLD RULES” IS INTRODUCED, CONDITIONS ARE CREATED FOR THIS STRATEGY TO BE A FAILURE. Even when there is a potentially winning idea at the base of the product, if in the strategies a key element of the declining Market is introduced (Sustaining Innovation), the product cannot develop its potential in the nascent Market.
This because the two forms of innovation that we seek to integrate ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT (“opposite”)
(the mindset of the two types of people operating within the Company is substantially different). CASE: Hybrid – John Deer
At the base of the market crisis there is a “cultural issue”. Today the Market requires a new form of innovation (Disruptive innovation), but THERE…
To be able to develop a real Disruptive innovation there is need for an Ecosystem that favors this form of innovation. In fact, disruptive innovation…
The new phase of the Market will be characterized by a new production mode that “Revolutionizes” the current methods: Smart Manufacturing. The current conception of…
● What IS and what IS NOT disrutpive innovation ● Why developing technologies are incompatible with disrutpive innovation ● What to do?
What are the reasons why the Incumbents are unable to innovate and regain sales success? . One of the reasons is the existence, within…
Foreign outsourcing is an excellent choice for linear innovation, but a fatal choice for disruptive innovation. The fact is that today, in a society that…
Today, Companies try to innovate by overcoming the sense of certainty.
But THE SENSE OF CERTAINTY – THANKS TO ITS VISION – IS PRECISELY WHAT LEADS THE START UP TO CREATE INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS.
It is useless to try to bring innovation into companies that are not themselves innovated (which are structured on an obsolete mindset). The innovation…
A third phase of the development of the modern (post-industrial) Company / Market is in progress. THE SOCIETY MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS IS NOW MANAGED “BOTTOM UP”. A new Economy based on Subsidiarity is developed, and A POST-INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION MODE THAT EXCEEDS THE “MASS PRODUCTION”.
*Towards a radically new model of Industry 4.0: introduction to a Smart Fabrication plan (FabLab 2.0)
The Fab Labs are part of the Market that is now at sunset (a failed Model). But from some qualities of Fab Labs new Business Models can be born (and new ways of Production/Distribution).
the consolidated companies of the market literally can’t develop disruptive innovation within them. they are the object of disruption, and therefore can not be the subject. the problem: ● lack of “intuition” ● lack of culture of (real) innovation. a real (disruptive) innovation can only come with a fresh start, from new comers.
The “revolution” (dirsruption) that is transforming the world of production is a phenomenon radically different from the one today defined as Industry 4.0.
The change concerns not only the product, but everything connected to it. Today it is necessary: a rethinking ● the why of a product ● the ideation/design process ● the production/distribution process. We move on to a new era of the new Economy: the Context economy.