THE CONCEPT OF INNOVATION IN ITSELF MUST BE RADICALLY CHANGED.
Innovation based on a continuous improvement of the products does not work when in History there are radical changes (as it was, for example, in the Industrial Revolution, or as it happens now).
Today there is no critical reflection on the failures of the Market, and therefore it continues unabated to proceed WITH THE SAME MINDSET (PARADIGM) WHICH HAS PRODUCED THE PROBLEMS THAT WE WANT TO SOLVE. A reflection on the basic principles of sustainable innovation.
► THAT DEVELOPED TODAY BY THE MARKET IS NOT A REAL INNOVATION: IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE ► the market must perform a quantum leap – a shift paradigm – in which they can radically change the business.
We know that there is a sustainable innovation and in-sustainable innovation. But we have to understand that un-sustainable innovation today is also to a large…
There is no culture of innovation, but AN APTITUDE FOR INNOVATION THAT DOES NOT RESIDE IN A RATIONAL LEVEL, OF “KNOWLEDGE” (OF NOTIONS). It is a typical quality of man: the capacity for intuition. WE NEED TO FOSTER THIS QUALITY
► The concept of disruption is not an “invention” of someone, but the description of a real phenomenon that affects our civilization. ► THE DISRUPTION IS IN ITSELF A NEUTRAL CONCEPT: it is positive for those who adapt to changes, and strongly negative for who remains on previous Models.
Most companies that try to innovate themselves (in order to adapt to the new market characterized by radical changes in Demand) fail not because…
A third phase of the development of the modern (post-industrial) Company / Market is in progress. THE SOCIETY MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS IS NOW MANAGED “BOTTOM UP”. A new Economy based on Subsidiarity is developed, and A POST-INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION MODE THAT EXCEEDS THE “MASS PRODUCTION”.
There is a lack of of the meaning of the terms referred to innovation like “radical”, “different” (“disruptive”). This does not allow the majority of the Market Player to develop a truly salable value. These terms indicate a substantial difference, or something absolutely new which is found on a plan completely different from the previous one. but today efforts are being made to develop “different” strategies which, however, remain on the same level, on the same qualitative level as the previous strategies.
A reflection on the innovation of the Cities (Smart Cities), which leads to conclusions that are radically different from those that currently drive public and private projects in this area.
Some specific highly innovative projects
Disruptive innovation is a “revolution” of the context in which it operates: this means “radical change” (from the roots) of culture, of the mindset used up to that point (change of operating principles, of conception of values, of a design approach, of types of communication, etc.).
Innovation is a modern concept to define the flow of inventions that have so far determined the so-called Progress of Humanity. And innovation has always…
Today there is no real innovation (attractive and sustainable for Customer), both by the part of the Big Player of the Market and by the part of the Public Administration. ► the Public Administration continues to be oriented towards costly (insustanable) solutions ► the Big Players of the Market continue to develop a pseudo-innovation █ THE LACK OF A VALUE-ORIENTED INNOVATION (effectively useful and sustainable): it is necessary
TO RESET THE INNOVATION.
Disruption is a quantum leap that can not be predicted with statistics. We must not incur the common error of the incumbents: evaluate the…
The Principles of Disruptive Innovation, ie the radical innovation necessary to succeed on the market today, are often interpreted in the wrong way: this…
the consolidated companies of the market literally can’t develop disruptive innovation within them. they are the object of disruption, and therefore can not be the subject. the problem: ● lack of “intuition” ● lack of culture of (real) innovation. a real (disruptive) innovation can only come with a fresh start, from new comers.
Today Managers and Consultants & the “intellectuals” are focused on the past: it is not bad faith, but it is a lack of ability to recognize the new.
The Peter principle must be updated as the Market has changed profoundly since the text was written: TODAY COMPETENCE IS ALREADY EXCLUDED IN THE RECRUITMENT PHASE.
The key to the development of technological solutions IS NOT THE TECHNOLOGY!
The quantum leap of the Market of the disruptive innovation is re-defining a role of technologies.